12.4.12

Assessment



This is the general document that my group (number 2) make in order to self assess the collaborative activity we carried out.
We will first show an evaluation of the participants’ attitudes towards the topic and by activity; then we will try to provide a self evaluation for the activities proposed.

Participants’ Assessment:

There were 5 groups structured as follows:
Group A: Chusa, Ariadna and Leticia
Group B: Belén, Ana, Daniel Muñoz and Andrea González
Group C: Pablo, Daniel Jarque, Raúl and Ruth
Group D: Gemma, Almudena Bellot, Azahara and Athina
Group E: Blanca and Raquel

GROUPS
ACTIVITY 1
ACTIVITY 2
ACTIVITY 3
COMMENTS
A
Very positive attitude
Well performance in their work (7 out of 8 questions answered)
Very positive attitude
They worked on their texts properly
Question: not very clearly expressed
Answer: correctly answered although it took time to understand the question
Much interest was shown
B
Negative attitude.
Passivity while accomplishing tasks (3 out of 8 questions answered)
They did not work on their texts the way it was proposed, they cheated one another, maybe collaborative work (?)
Question: The person making the question did not even know what was asking for.
Answer: The answer was correct.
Tasks were not divided in a balanced way, it is a very heterogenous group.
C
Didn´t follow the instructions given.
Fair performance in their results for this activity (5 out of 8 questions answered)
Negative attitude
Although they worked a bit on their texts.
Question: Well formulated and interesting.
Answer: Did not give the correct answer (the question was not well done, could this be the reason?)
Quite of interest was shown despite their behavior since they made suggestions for improvement.
D
Very positive attitude
Well performance in their work (6 out of 8 questions answered)
Very positive attitude
They worked on their texts in a fair way.
Question: Well formulated and interesting.
Answer: Did not give the correct answer (the question was not clearly expressed, could this be the reason?)
A very balanced group.
E
Didn´t follow the instructions given.
Fair performance in their results for this activity (5 out of 8 questions answered)
Very positive attitude
They worked on their texts properly
Question: It was too wide at the beginning, it needed to be narrowed.
Answer: The answer was correct.
They were only two participants in this group to do the same work as groups composed of 4 persons.

                                            

Self Assessment:

For our self evaluation we are going to highlight the things we belief we have done better and things that we need to improve:

WELL DONE
IMPROVEMENT IS NEEDED

We adapted very well and fast to new necessities that have arise during the activity:
-          Timing adaptation
-          Development of the activity

Better timing planning

Natural role distribution within our group:
-          Anna: Explaining Activities and giving instructions
-          Elisa: Organizing the work
-          Myriam: Observing within the groups
-          Almudena: Assessment

More simple and clear explanations

Make activities less complex

Look for new techniques for motivating demotivated participants

                                            

Suggestions:

A suggestion was made by a participant (Raúl) in order to improve our activities; this was to repeat the first activity at the end of the rest of the activities in order for them to make sure that they have understood properly the topic.

We must conclude that from the participants’ point of view the topic was well understood and learned, their self-assessment shows that almost all of them acquired some knowledge about what ‘Special Education Needs provision within Mainstream Education’ is.

Personal opinion:


From my point of view, our collaborative activity was well done in general terms. We find some problems during the activity that we were able to solve and the students that were focused on the activity learn the main ideas of our topic. Of course, there are a lot of things that we have to learn and to improve for future times, but I am glad with the work we did.

No comments:

Post a Comment